MIXED WELCOME FOR LONDON'S CASINO SHORTLIST - DOOCEY

12.00.00am BST (GMT +0100) Wed 24th May 2006

Commenting on the announcement that Brent and Greenwich have been placed on the shortlist for the UK's first Las Vegas style casino, Liberal Democrat Chair of the Economic Development, Culture, Sport and Tourism Committee in the London Assembly, Dee Doocey, said:

"While I welcome the potential boost to tourism in London that a so called super-Casino in Brent or Greenwich could bring, any operator must be required to demonstrate that they will create new and sustainable employment opportunities for Londoners. I am also concerned at the impact on local residents of the potential for greatly increased traffic given the existing stresses and strains on public transport in the areas."

The London Assembly report "On the Cards, The proposals for new casinos in London" recommended that any large casino should be sited as part of a clearly defined and separate leisure/entertainment destination. It should also be located away from residential development and from everyday high street shopping, to minimize loss of amenity and to minimize impulse gambling opportunities

ENDS

Notes to Editors:

1. "On the Cards; The proposals for new casinos in London" was published by the London Assembly Economic Development, Culture, Sport and Tourism Committee in November 2005. The report is available on the London Assembly website at: www.london.gov.uk/assembly/reports/econsd.jsp

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story
Comment on this news story
Previous news story: "TUBE SCANNERS WILL BE A COST TOO FAR FOR RACIAL TENSIONS IN LONDON" - POPE (Wed 17th May 2006).
Next news story: FARE EVASION STILL TWICE AS HIGH ON BENDY BUSES - POPE (Wed 24th May 2006).

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by London Assembly Liberal Democrats, City Hall, The Queen's Walk, London SE1 2AA.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.